I think this question is extremely inconsistent with what any paper test can measure. Mainly because I know adults who never graduated high school yet they can decipher computer codes or take apart and put back together whole engines. There are some people who couldn’t find it in themselves to ever accomplish an A, yet they have more common sense in their pinky than some with a law degree. Measuring a child’s mind and their ability has to refer solely on that child’s ability to come up with an answer. I would severely suggest not saying that a child who cannot run up to and kick a ball has a lack in ability to kick a ball, when the same child could throw a ball like a big leaguer, or finds that math comes easily.
So, to measure or assess a child holistically I think more of a job interview should be approached to the child. Verbal questions as well as written. I also wouldn’t consider time as a factor in completing answers because if our elders have taught us anything it’s that patience is a virtue and also speaking too quickly often spoils what the mind intended to say.
One thing I read that was interesting, and that also reminded me of a report I did on dinosaurs (ironically), is that children in Brazil who sell items on the street can confidently hustle prices and arrange payments and take and give back money. However, these same children would not be as efficient if you put them in a classroom with other students and expected the same math greatness out of them. Here’s the interesting part- they know math, only the math they need to know to survive. “A drawback to the general intelligence school of thought is that it is heavily dependent on psychometric evaluations. Consequently, it cannot take into account the vast array of different talents that people have” (Paik, S. 1998) So an IQ test would put these kids way below, when in fact they are running businesses!
For the comparison to dinosaurs, I wrote a paper on the intelligence of these long ago creatures and found out that they had been mislabeled for years! The brain size of dinosaurs were being compared to our modern day birds and reptiles and in return were being found to be quite small, thus equally less intelligence. Although, dinosaurs managed to stay on this planet for millions of years and thrive and evolve. They weren’t less intelligent than our friendly fliers today; they only were as intelligent as they needed to be to get by.
Paik, Han S. One Intelligence or Many? Alternative Approaches to Cognitive Abilities. Washington University, 1998. http://www.personalityresearch.org/papers/paik.html
I cannot agree with you more. It seems as though we are so concerned with meeting the standards, they we have lost sight of the "whole-child". We now have remedial classes for those that scored low in certain areas such as reading and math. However, if these children had been tested in other areas such as art, music etc., they might have scored very high. In the U.S., our public education system pushes "teaching to the test". The teacher satisfaction is nationally on the low-end. Students are feeling more stress than ever, to score high on the many assessments. What happened to the enjoyment and "love of learning"? It seems to have been replaced by boring, systematic teaching that in the end seems to benefit very few.
ReplyDeleteInteresting post Tina! I totally agree that IQ tests don't tell us the whole story. Intelligence comes in all shapes and sizes and looks different from one person to the next. I'm so glad you mentioned "common sense"; how do we test for that? How do we test for intuitiveness? I'm sure the little boy in Brazil had common sense, a great capacity for intuitiveness and had all the necessary math skills need to negotiate a price and give change.
ReplyDeleteInteresting that dinosaurs lived so long!
Joey
June 10, 2011 3:26 PM
Hi Tina,
ReplyDeleteI found that write up about the child in another country being skilled in math so he can provide a service/have a business, really fascinating. You are right about his having the skill he needs to survive and to me, is quite intelligent. And, if we gave him a standard math test, which we use in our public schools, he may do well on it. However, we can clearly see how meaningless this test would be to determine his ability/aptitude. He is being successful, is skilled and does have the ability to "do math".
I loved your info on the dinosaurs, too. I wonder if there are any other animals this may apply to as well?
Great post!
Julie
You are so correct in saying that there are those people that some people have a lot of common sense rather than book sense. Who is to say which is more important? I, personally, think that both are equally as important. My grandmother used to say she would rather have common sense than book sense, because with common sense she knew how to survive without thinking you had to have a text book to read about survival. I really like the examples you provided.
ReplyDeleteTo all who commented on book smarts vs. common sense . . .
ReplyDeleteI think both are needed in order to succeed. It is true that there are some people with book smarts who lacks common sense and vice versa. In some cases, book smart can bring you success, help you get a decent job, and many people tends to respect those with book smarts because they are more knowledgeable and resourceful. On the other hand, having common sense can teach you self-awareness and how to take better responsibility. People with common sense tends to be more resourceful too when it comes to life experiences. Whatever gets you further in life all depends on the individual whether you're book smart, street smart, people smart, sport smart, etc.
I enjoyed reading all of your comments.
Valerie
Tina,
ReplyDeleteYou and I are on the same page! The comparison of performing a "job interview" is a perfect analogy. When I hire teachers, they complete written questions, we talk for awhile, and then I observe them in the classroom. Using these methods to assess a child's abilities and knowledge would be significantly more fair and more substantive.
I also love the example of the children in Brazil--at a very basic level, as humans we tend to learn what we need to survive!
Great blog!
~Shawn